When organizations decide they need to develop AI literacy across their workforce, the instinct is almost always to commission training. A curriculum is designed. Employees are enrolled in sessions, sometimes in person, more often online. Completion rates are tracked. A certification is issued. The initiative is declared a success. The problem is not that this kind of training is without value. It is that it is solving for the wrong outcome. The goal of enterprise AI fluency is not that employees can pass a test about how large language models work — it is that teams can identify where AI creates genuine leverage in their work, engage critically with AI outputs, and integrate AI-enabled processes into how they actually operate day to day.
Literacy, in the educational sense, describes a threshold competency. You are either literate or you are not. Fluency describes something different: an active, practiced capability that develops through use rather than instruction and that atrophies without continued application. What organizations are actually trying to build is fluency, not literacy. Fluency develops through exposure, experimentation, feedback, and iteration — in context, over time. A workshop, however well-designed, can create the conditions for fluency to begin developing. It cannot, on its own, produce it.
The training programs that underdeliver on AI capability building share a few common characteristics. They are designed around content rather than application. They treat AI as a topic to be understood rather than a capability to be exercised. They measure success through participation rather than changed behavior. And they are typically disconnected from the specific workflows and decision contexts where AI capability would actually make a difference. Generic AI literacy training teaches employees what AI is and, in broad terms, what it can do. It does not help them answer the question that actually determines whether fluency develops: where in my specific work does AI create leverage, and how do I access that leverage in practice?
The organizations building durable AI fluency are doing something that looks less like training and more like capability infrastructure. They are embedding AI tool usage into standard operating procedures for specific functions, so that the habit of using AI is built through daily work rather than through instruction. They are creating structured forums where teams can share what is working and what is not, building collective intelligence about AI application. And they are developing internal AI champions — people within each function who have gone deeper on AI application in their specific context and can serve as practical guides for their colleagues.
Leaders who want to build genuine AI fluency in their organizations need to shift the question they are asking. The question is not how do we train our people on AI. It is how do we create the conditions in which AI fluency can develop through work. That means giving teams access to tools and the latitude to experiment with them. It means tolerating the inefficiency of early-stage application while capability builds. It means measuring not just whether people completed training but whether their work has actually changed. The organizations willing to make that investment are the ones that will find they have built something genuinely difficult for competitors to replicate: a workforce that knows not just what AI is, but how to use it.
Want to learn more?
Get in Touch